{"id":970,"date":"2015-09-15T23:59:42","date_gmt":"2015-09-15T21:59:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=970"},"modified":"2015-09-20T14:12:40","modified_gmt":"2015-09-20T12:12:40","slug":"15-09-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2015\/09\/15\/15-09-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"15.09.2015"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Dosya imha etmek eskidendi \u2013 Th\u00fcringen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;ndeki dosyalar \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 \u015fekilde \u00e7o\u011fald\u0131<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn tek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak, m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n dilek\u00e7esi \u00fczerine Th\u00fcringen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 J\u00fcrgen Zweigert \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Zweigert 1997 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2000 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar &#8220;Hagel&#8221; kod ald\u0131 Marcel Degner&#8217;den sorumlu ki\u015fileren biriydi. 2000 y\u0131l\u0131nda kimli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kana kadar &#8220;Blood and Honour&#8221; Th\u00fcringen&#8217;in ba\u015fkan\u0131 ve B &amp; H Almanya&#8217;n\u0131n sayman\u0131 olan Degner, M\u00fcnih Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi&#8217;nde verdi\u011fi ifadede Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;nde \u00e7al\u0131\u015fm\u0131\u015f veya oradan herhangi bir para alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu \u0131srarla reddetmi\u015fti (bkz. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2015\/03\/11\/11-03-2015\/\" target=\"_blank\">11.03.2015<\/a> ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2015\/05\/20\/20-05-2015\/\" target=\"_blank\">20.05.2015<\/a> tarihli bloglar).<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Degner&#8217;den sorumlu olan Zweigert, bug\u00fcn sadece &#8220;Hagel&#8221; kod adl\u0131 ki\u015finin Marcel Degner oldu\u011funu do\u011frulamakla kalmad\u0131, bu ki\u015finin kaynaklar\u0131 konusunda \u00e7ok a\u00e7\u0131k oldu\u011funu ve 3 y\u0131l boyunca ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen haftal\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerin her birinde kendisine y\u00fczlerce Alman Mark\u0131 \u00f6deme yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu bile anlatt\u0131. B\u00f6ylelikle Degner&#8217;i muhbir Brandt&#8217;la ayn\u0131 seviyede g\u00f6rmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn: Kendisi \u00e7ok iyi bir mevkide g\u00f6rev yap\u0131yordu (tan\u0131k, muhbirin B &amp; H yap\u0131s\u0131nda (al\u0131nt\u0131!) &#8220;iyi bir kurulu\u015f i\u015fi&#8221; \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan bahsetti) ve bunun i\u00e7in Brandt&#8217;\u0131nkine yak\u0131n miktarda bir maddi m\u00fckafat al\u0131yordu.<\/p>\n<p>Yine Degner&#8217;den sorumlu olan tan\u0131k Wie\u00dfner 22.04.2015 tarihli ana duru\u015fmada Degner&#8217;in Th\u00fcringen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;ndeki (\u015fahsi) dosyalar\u0131nda sadece az bilgi i\u00e7eren \u00fc\u00e7 sayfa bulundu\u011funu, dosyalar\u0131n geri kalan\u0131n\u0131n imha edilmi\u015f oldu\u011funu anlatm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Ancak meclisten gelen ba\u015fvuru \u00fczerine Federal Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;nde Degner&#8217;le ilgili en az 69 raporun bulundu\u011fu ortaya \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131 ve heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 hakim, m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n dilek\u00e7esi \u00fczerine tan\u0131ktan sorgusunun \u00f6ncesinde bu dosyalar\u0131 incelemesini istemi\u015fti. Zweigert \u015fimdi Th\u00fcringen Eyaleti Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;nde yakla\u015f\u0131k 100 rapor incelemi\u015f oldu\u011funu ve bunlar\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda da Degner&#8217;le yap\u0131lan g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmelerle ilgili olarak Wie\u00dfner taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f 12-14 adet ve Neisen isimli ba\u015fka bir i\u015f arkada\u015f\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f 10 adet rapor bulundu\u011funu ifade etti. Muhbirin rapor say\u0131s\u0131n\u0131n mucizevi \u015fekilde 69&#8217;dan 100&#8217;e \u00e7\u0131kmas\u0131n\u0131n nedeninin acilen a\u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u011fa kavu\u015fturulmas\u0131 gerekiyot.<\/p>\n<p>Zweigert&#8217;in ifadesi bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda da ayd\u0131nlat\u0131c\u0131yd\u0131: Ortadan kaybolan \u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc ve genel olarak Jena ile ilgili b\u00fct\u00fcn konulardan tamamen Wie\u00dfner&#8217;in sorumlu oldu\u011fu bilgisini verdi. \u00dc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn o zamanlar oport\u00fcnist eylemciler oldu\u011fu tahmin ediliyordu, onlarla \u00f6zel bir \u015fekilde ilgilenilmiyordu. Ancak tan\u0131k ayn\u0131 zamanda Eyalet Kriminal Dairesi&#8217;nin hedef aray\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 Wunderlich&#8217;in Wie\u00dfner&#8217;le s\u0131k s\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc,; Zsch\u00e4pe, Mundlos ve B\u00f6hnhardt hakk\u0131nda konu\u015ftuklar\u0131n\u0131 da s\u00f6yledi. \u00dc\u00e7l\u00fc madem sadece \u00f6nemsiz oport\u00fcnistler olarak g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyordu, neden muhbir y\u00f6neticileri aras\u0131nda b\u00f6ylesi detayl\u0131 bir yetki da\u011f\u0131l\u0131m\u0131 gerekliydi ve neden Eyalet Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi ve bir hedef aray\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 aras\u0131nda s\u0131k s\u0131k g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler ger\u00e7ekle\u015fiyordu?<\/p>\n<p>\u00dc\u00e7l\u00fcn\u00fcn ortadan kaybolmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan amirlerinin direktifi \u00fczerine sorumlusu oldu\u011fu t\u00fcm muhbirlere B\u00f6hnhardt, Zsch\u00e4pe ve Mundlos hakk\u0131nda tek bir kez soru sormu\u015ftu. Degner onlar\u0131 tan\u0131mad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6ylemi\u015fti. Bunu o zaman raporuna kaydetmemi\u015fti. Zweigert, Th\u00fcringen&#8217;de Meclis Ara\u015ft\u0131rma Komisyonu&#8217;nda ger\u00e7ekle\u015fen ilk sorgusunda, b\u00f6ylesi bir g\u00f6rev alm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011funu dikkat \u00e7ekici \u015fekilde reddetmi\u015fti. O zamanki ifadesine g\u00f6re Degner&#8217;e ortadan kaybolanlarla ilgili soru sormam\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Buradaki \u00e7eli\u015fkiden bahsedilmesi \u00fczerine ara\u015ft\u0131rma komisyonundaki sorgunun \u00e7ok ani ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti\u011fini, bug\u00fcn olaylar\u0131 daha iyi hat\u0131rlad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. Ona g\u00f6re k\u00f6t\u00fc d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnenlerin kendileri k\u00f6t\u00fcyd\u00fc.<\/p>\n<p>Tan\u0131k, muhbirin san\u0131k Wohlleben ve Jena&#8217;l\u0131 di\u011fer Th\u00fcringen Vatan Koruma \u00fcyeleriyle olas\u0131 bir i\u015fbirli\u011fi hakk\u0131ndaki \u00e7ok say\u0131da soruyu yan\u0131tlayamad\u0131, ama kendisine haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131 i\u00e7in sunulan raporlardan \u00f6yle oldu\u011funun anla\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar gerekti\u011fi \u00fczere tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 sorgusuna son verilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131lar ve \u00f6ncelikle bu muhbir raporlar\u0131n\u0131n dava kapsam\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in dilek\u00e7e verdiler. Mahkemenin bu dilek\u00e7e hakk\u0131nda karar vermesi gerekiyot.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dosya imha etmek eskidendi \u2013 Th\u00fcringen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi&#8217;ndeki dosyalar \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 \u015fekilde \u00e7o\u011fald\u0131 Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn tek tan\u0131\u011f\u0131 olarak, m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n dilek\u00e7esi \u00fczerine Th\u00fcringen Anayasay\u0131 Koruma Dairesi eski \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan\u0131 J\u00fcrgen Zweigert \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Zweigert 1997 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2000 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar &#8220;Hagel&#8221; kod ald\u0131 Marcel Degner&#8217;den sorumlu ki\u015fileren biriydi. 2000 y\u0131l\u0131nda kimli\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131\u011fa \u00e7\u0131kana kadar &#8220;Blood and Honour&#8221; Th\u00fcringen&#8217;in ba\u015fkan\u0131 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-970","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/970","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=970"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/970\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":974,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/970\/revisions\/974"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=970"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=970"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=970"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}