{"id":989,"date":"2015-09-30T23:39:58","date_gmt":"2015-09-30T21:39:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/?p=989"},"modified":"2015-10-07T21:10:47","modified_gmt":"2015-10-07T19:10:47","slug":"30-09-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2015\/09\/30\/30-09-2015\/","title":{"rendered":"30.09.2015"},"content":{"rendered":"<h4>Ba\u015fka delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleri de reddedildi &#8211; Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi olaylar\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131yor<\/h4>\n<p>Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn ilk tan\u0131klar\u0131, 2011 Haziran\u2019\u0131nda Beate Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019yi NSU\u2019nun Zwickau\u2019da kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 evden tren istasyonuna g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00f6yleyen taksi \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc sorgulam\u0131\u015f olan iki polis memuruydu. Bu taksi yolculu\u011fu, Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin bilgisayar\u0131nda bulunan ve san\u0131k Gerlach\u2019\u0131n oturdu\u011fu yerle olan bir tren ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131na denk d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyordu (bkz.<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/2015\/09\/02\/02-09-2015\/\" target=\"_blank\"> 02.09.2015<\/a> tarihli blog). Polis memurlar\u0131, tan\u0131\u011f\u0131n hat\u0131rlad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131n tuttuklar\u0131 kay\u0131ttakilerle \u00f6rt\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00f6ylediler. Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019yi 16.6.2011 sabah\u0131 tren istasyonuna g\u00f6t\u00fcrm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc, ayr\u0131ca bunun birka\u00e7 hafta \u00f6ncesinde Uwe B\u00f6hnhardt\u2019\u0131 da bir kez bir yere b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin avukat\u0131 Stahl\u2019\u0131n memurlar\u0131n \u00e7eli\u015fkilerini sorgulama \u00e7abalar\u0131n\u0131n i\u00e7erikten ziyade tela\u015ftan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir kez daha be lli oldu.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Ard\u0131ndan Andr\u00e9 Eminger\u2019in d\u00f6vmelerinin foto\u011fraflar\u0131n\u0131 incelemi\u015f olan bir memur ifade verdi. Eminger\u2019in v\u00fccudunda en sert Nasyonal Sosyalist deyi\u015flerden bir\u00e7o\u011fu bulunuyordu: bir SS kurukafas\u0131, runik yaz\u0131yla yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f NS slogan\u0131 \u201cSen hi\u00e7bir\u015feysin, milletin her \u015fey\u201d, Hitler Gen\u00e7li\u011fi\u2019nin slogan\u0131 \u201cKan ve Onur (\u0130ngilizcesi \u201cBlood and Honour\u201d), kurucular\u0131 aras\u0131nda bulundu\u011fu \u201cWei\u00dfe Bruderschaft Erzgebirge\u201cnin ismi ve hepsini ta\u00e7land\u0131ran, karn\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fck harflerle yaz\u0131l\u0131 \u201cDie, Jew, Die\u201d (\u00d6l Yahudi, \u00d6l\u201d Tatillerde \u00e7ekilmi\u015f sahil foto\u011fraflar\u0131ndan bu yaz\u0131lar\u0131 herkese g\u00f6stermeyi sevdi\u011fi anla\u015f\u0131l\u0131yordu.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6\u011fle aras\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan m\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar\u0131n son iki y\u0131ld\u0131r verdikleri delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerini reddeden h\u00fck\u00fcmler ikinci kez ard\u0131 ard\u0131nda okundu. K\u0131smen basmakal\u0131p bir \u015fekilde haz\u0131rlanm\u0131\u015f olan bu h\u00fck\u00fcmlerde \u015fa\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 olan delil tespiti dilek\u00e7elerinin reddedilmes i de\u011fildi. Dortmundlu Nazi camias\u0131n\u0131n Combat 18 faaliyetlerine y\u00f6nelik dilek\u00e7e 6.11.2014 tarihinde verilmi\u015fti, yani mahkemenin onu kabul etmek istemedi\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. \u015ea\u015f\u0131rt\u0131c\u0131 olan mahkemenin, olay yerlerindeki organize Nazilerin NSU ile ve b\u00f6ylelikle i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar ile olas\u0131 ba\u011flant\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131 dava i\u00e7in \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131m\u0131yormu\u015f gibi g\u00f6stermesiydi. Mahkemenin ter\u00f6rist \u00f6rg\u00fct NSU&#8217;nun ve taraf\u0131ndan i\u015flenen su\u00e7lar\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 m\u0131 yoksa sadece M\u00fcnih&#8217;te yarg\u0131lanan \u00fcyeler ve destek\u00e7ilerinin h\u00fck\u00fcm giymesini mi hedefledi\u011fine art\u0131k karar vermesi gerekiyor. Heyet ba\u015fkan\u0131 hakim ge\u00e7en iki y\u0131l i\u00e7erisinde s\u0131k s\u0131k olaylar\u0131n ger\u00e7ekten ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istedi\u011fini g\u00f6sterdi, \u015fimdiyse bu karara ra\u011fmen olay yerlerindeki Nazi yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131yla olas\u0131 ba\u011flant\u0131lar ve silahl\u0131 gruplardan olu\u015fan \u00fclke \u00e7p\u011f\u0131ndaki bir a\u011f\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131 davan\u0131n d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda tutulmak isteniyor gibi g\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcyor. Buna uygun \u015fekilde, \u00f6len muhbir Thomas Richter&#8217;in teslim etti\u011fi &#8220;NSU-NSDAP&#8221; CD&#8217;sinin dava kapsam\u0131nda incelenebilmesi i\u00e7in verilen delil tespiti dilek\u00e7esi de reddedildi.<\/p>\n<p>M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar, Ba\u015fsavc\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n -NSU&#8217;yu izole bir grup olarak g\u00f6stermek istedi\u011fi k\u0131s\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n yanl\u0131\u015fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 halihaz\u0131rda kan\u0131tlanm\u0131\u015f- iddianamesine bu denli dayanan bir g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn davan\u0131n boyutu a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yetersiz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 muhakkak bir kez daha g\u00f6sterecekler. M\u00fcdahil davac\u0131lar bunun d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda ba\u015fka dilek\u00e7eler vererek olaylar\u0131n olabildi\u011fince kapsaml\u0131 \u015fekilde ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131nda \u0131srar edecek.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ba\u015fka delil tespiti dilek\u00e7eleri de reddedildi &#8211; Eyalet Y\u00fcksek Mahkemesi olaylar\u0131n ayd\u0131nlat\u0131lmas\u0131ndan ka\u00e7\u0131n\u0131yor Bug\u00fcn\u00fcn ilk tan\u0131klar\u0131, 2011 Haziran\u2019\u0131nda Beate Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019yi NSU\u2019nun Zwickau\u2019da kald\u0131\u011f\u0131 evden tren istasyonuna g\u00f6t\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc s\u00f6yleyen taksi \u015fof\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fc sorgulam\u0131\u015f olan iki polis memuruydu. Bu taksi yolculu\u011fu, Zsch\u00e4pe\u2019nin bilgisayar\u0131nda bulunan ve san\u0131k Gerlach\u2019\u0131n oturdu\u011fu yerle olan bir tren ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131na denk d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyordu (bkz. 02.09.2015 tarihli [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_s2mail":"yes","footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-989","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allgemein"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/989","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=989"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/989\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":991,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/989\/revisions\/991"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=989"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=989"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsu-nebenklage.de\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=989"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}